R-alpha: Postscript bug ...
Ross Ihaka
ihaka@stat.auckland.ac.nz
Thu, 24 Apr 1997 22:01:40 +1200 (NZST)
> A succession of 0.49.n's would be better, I'd say. Preferably using
> patches from 0.49 for those with slow links, but that's not all that
> important. Heck, it's only 10 minutes across a 14k4 modem (but it took
> more than an hour to transfer R7.tgz from here to Kurt in Vienna the
> other day - that's between two sites with direct net connections...).
And here was I thinking that the steam-driven abacus we use for
R development was low tech ...
I will try to send out "important" patches, but its hard to maintain
distinct branches and we have already diverged from 0.49 here.
Ross
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-