Thank you Joel & Stephen.  I will look into that. When I first set it up I
guess Xemacs was the best but I'm glad to know that there are other options.
I'm slowly moving over to a Unix environment so hopefully that will solve
all future problems...

Best,

Be

On 6/28/07, Joel J. Adamson <jadamson@partners.org> wrote:
>
> Stephen Eglen <S.J.Eglen@damtp.cam.ac.uk> writes:
>
> > XEmacs used to have a lot better graphical support than Emacs, but
> > with the release of Emacs 22, I think that difference has disappeared.
> > Further, thanks to people like Vincent Goulet, the availability of
> > binaries like the above, should make using Emacs more attractive
> > again.  I'd strongly push for people to switch back to Emacs!
> >
> > Stephen
>
> Roger that: I got this error on XEmacs 21.4.19; it was one of the
> reasons I switched to Emacs.  And Dr. Eglen is correct, the GUI of
> Emacs 22 is totally sweet.  I even added back in the scrollbars,
> menubar and toolbar (that I don't use) just because they look nice ;)
>
> Joel
>
> --
> Joel J. Adamson
> Biostatistician
> Pediatric Psychopharmacology Research Unit
> Massachusetts General Hospital
> Boston, MA  02114
> (617) 643-1432
> (303) 880-3109
>
> *Joel's guide to sending attachments:
> 1.  put all the files you want to send in a folder and archive the
> folder using tar, then compress it with gzip or bzip2
> 2.  please send me .pdf, .html, or text in place of Word documents:
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/sylvester-response.html
>
> *Did you know there's a FREE alternative to using word processors?
> http://www.edafe.org/latex/
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX
> http://nitens.org/taraborelli/latex
>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted in this electronic communicati...{{dropped}}


