[ESS] Is this useful for discriminating Sweave vs knitr docs?
@p|nuv|t @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Tue Apr 7 12:39:04 CEST 2015
Yeh. R studio cooking up new conventions pretty much every day. There is
also a specialized project_name.Rproj that stores all the meta data
about the project and how R studio interacts with it. If we want to be
compatible with them we will also need to parse that file.
>>> Stephen Eglen on Tue, 07 Apr 2015 11:20:58 +0100 wrote:
>> I agree that the ESS should use the file ocal variables approach and not
>> use the RStudio syntax, but I would suggest that ESS can offer to *add*
>> the file local variables if the RStudio syntax is present and possibly
>> vice versa as well, i.e. write, in *addition* to the file local
>> variables, the RStudio syntax as well?
> Thanks Martin, Rainer.
> I'm a bit wary of having two syntaxes around (think about the poor end
> user... what if two conflicting values are provided?).
> Any of the Rstudio team on here and wish to comment? I'm all for trying
> to ensure we keep our conventions together a bit more closely.
> (Sectioning comments is another that springs to mind.)
> ESS-help using r-project.org mailing list
More information about the ESS-help