[ESS] Does M-x package-install compile ESS's e-lisp?
istazahn at gmail.com
Tue Feb 19 17:57:11 CET 2013
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Rodney Sparapani <rsparapa at mcw.edu> wrote:
> On 02/18/2013 10:16 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> It's just wrong to have built (docu) files in the revision
>> control system sources.
>> I have no idea about MELPA yet, but why can't they work off the
>> ess tarball ?
>> We can change the format of the tarball if it helps them.
> Hi Martin:
> Good question! And I suppose the answer is: it's a github thing,
> you wouldn't understand ;o) The less glib answer, I guess, has to
> do with the recipe...
> (ess :repo "emacs-ess/ESS" :fetcher github :files
> ("*.el" ("lisp" "lisp/*.el") ("etc" "etc/*")))
> The recipe just grabs the lisp/*.el files and the files in etc. It
> doesn't bother with the tarball since it is not in the git repo and
> it doesn't grab the files in doc since ... Since, I don't know
> why. I guess githubbers are so bleeding edge they don't read the
> documentation?!? I don't know. ESS users need to keep in mind that
> the package manager is very EXPERIMENTAL and not supported by anyone.
The package manager is part of emacs
and is therefore presumably supported by GNU. I think you mean that
any ESS package is experimental?
> Rodney Sparapani, PhD Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research
> Sr. Biostatistician http://www.mcw.edu/pcor
> 4 wheels good, 2 wheels better! Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW)
> WWLD?: What Would Lombardi Do? Milwaukee, WI, USA
> ESS-help at r-project.org mailing list
More information about the ESS-help