[ESS-bugs] OOps! ESS partly fails in non-English locales!
Kurt Hornik
Kurt.Hornik at wu-wien.ac.at
Fri Aug 5 22:25:18 CEST 2005
>>>>> Stephen Eglen writes:
> Martin Maechler writes:
>> >>>>> "StEgl" == Stephen Eglen <S.J.Eglen at damtp.cam.ac.uk>
>> >>>>> on Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:31:40 +0100 writes:
>>
StEgl> thanks for follow up Martin.
>>
>> >> One thing: May be it is not "more problematic" than the problem I
>> >> reported. The "only" mistake is the mini-buffer message "Not a
>> >> syntax error", but then one at least gets to see a relatively
>> >> simply to understand message.
>>
StEgl> Yes, agree - sorry, "problematic" was a bad choice of wording from me.
>>
StEgl> I can fix the regexp for this particular error:
>>
StEgl> Error in parse(file, n = -1, NULL, "?") : syntax error on line 3
>>
StEgl> perhaps by a regexp searching for
>>
StEgl> syntax error on line [line number]
>>
StEgl> but is that likely to be good enough for catching all R errors?
>>
>> not all R errors for sure.
>>
>> But for C-c C-l, we know that R (and S-plus) uses source(),
>> so we have to think about the errors that happen from source().
>>
>> There, the syntax error is really a special interesting case,
>> because that one can be pointed to by a line number.
>> For R, it will always happen from
>> .Internal(parse(file, n = -1, NULL, "?")))
>>
>> now that leads to calling do_parse in source.c, i.e.
>> https://svn.R-project.org/R/trunk/src/main/source.c
>>
>> which shows you
>>
>> if (status != PARSE_OK)
>> errorcall(call, _("syntax error on line %d"), R_ParseError);
>>
>> The "errorcall(call, ..)" part entails that the message (in an
>> English locale!) will be
>>
>> Error in parse(.....) : syntax error on line <n>
>>
>> In a German locale, it's e.g.
>>
>> Fehler in parse(file, n = -1, NULL, "?") : Syntaxfehler in Zeile 1
>>
>> --
>>
>> Hence, for English
>>
>> "^Error .* syntax error"
>> or German
>> "^Fehler .* Syntaxfehler"
>>
>> would work.
>> I think ideally, one would make use of the things we have
>> already
>> ess-dump-error-re ( == "[Ee]rror" for English)
>>
>> and/or better of something derived from
>>
>> (defvar ess-R-message-prefixes
>> '("Error:" "Error in"
>> "Warning:" "Warning in"
>> "Warning messages?"))
>>
>> (which would need to be put in two parts: one for errors the
>> other for warnings).
> Ok, I can take a look at this tomorrow, to at least get the errors
> detected again.
>> I still think the best solution would be that R (or S-plus or
>> ...) at startup of "inferior-*"
>> produces these errors on purpose by eval-ing erronous examples
>> i.e. sends some commands to R such as
>>
>> parse(text="1]")
>> eval(parse(text="rpois(-1)"))
>> eval(parse(text="rpois(-1,1)"))
>> cat("1]", file=(.tf <- tempfile())) ; try(parse(file=.tf)); unlink(.tf)
>>
>> and out of the R (or S+ ..)
>> error message auto-produces the relevant pattern to use.
>>
>> This way, ESS adapts to the system, including locale setting,
>> also for future systems / locales.
> That sounds like a really neat idea if we can add that!
Yes, that looks very nice.
-k
More information about the ESS-bugs
mailing list