[ESS-bugs] ess-mode 5.2.7; cannot get help for contour()
Martin Maechler
maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch
Thu Jun 23 09:18:59 CEST 2005
>>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch>
>>>>> on Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:12:48 +0200 writes:
>>>>> "StEgl" == Stephen Eglen <S.J.Eglen at damtp.cam.ac.uk>
>>>>> on Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:19:36 +0100 writes:
StEgl> hi martin,
>>>
StEgl> Thanks for fixing this. I had a quick look at how the function
StEgl> ess-help-bogus-buffer-p is deciding contour is bogus - but couldn't
StEgl> see anything obvious - but I didn't step through the code. Any one
StEgl> else know whether there is something to fix here?
>>>
>>> There must be. Since we can reproduce Sebastian's problem now
>>> by (setq ess-help-kill-bogus-buffers t) , we have two things going wrong :
>>>
>>> 1) contour's help buffer is considered bogous {and Stephen was
>>> trying to debug this}
>>>
>>> 2) The (mini buffer) message for such a "bogous" buffer is
>>>
>>> "no documentation"
>>>
>>> which is wrong and leading users to wrong conclusions.
StEgl> what is the definition of a bogus help buffer?
StEgl> I can volunteer to look at this, once I know what the definiton of a
StEgl> bogus help buffer is!
MM> E.g., the one you get from
MM> ?blabla {in R}
MM> or
MM> C-c C-v blabla {in R or S-plus}
{and MM pressed the "Send" equivalent of emacs' vm too quickly}
I had wanted to add that the bogus buffers look slightly
different in different "S engines" :
R's say
--------------------
No documentation for 'blabla' in specified packages and libraries:
you could try 'help.search("blabla")'
--------------------
S-plus 6.2 (Linux) says
--------------------
No documentation for topic "blabla"
--------------------
Martin
More information about the ESS-bugs
mailing list