Yes. That was my original thought too. I was wondering whether there is a
more straight forward method.

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Michael Lawrence <
lawrence.michael@gene.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Cheng-Yuan Kao <neokao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I did check inparanoid before. My impression is that inparanoid only does
>> two species comparison although they seem to have all the species we need.
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>>
> Aren't the pairwise homologies enough? You could just look for complete
> cliques in the graph formed from the pairwise homologies that contain all 5
> species of interest, but not the other three.
>
> Or am I missing something?
>
> Michael
>
>>  On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Michael Lawrence <
>> lawrence.michael@gene.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Take a look at the inparanoid annotation packages. May or may not have
>>> all the species you need.
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Cheng-Yuan Kao <neokao@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, there,
>>>>
>>>> We are trying to identify genes conserved in 5 eukaryotic species but
>>>> not in
>>>> 3 other eukaryotic species.
>>>> Is there a way to do it with some websites?
>>>>
>>>> Or is there a program from somewhere or a package from Bioconductor
>>>> tailored
>>>> for this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your suggestions will be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bioconductor mailing list
>>>> Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>>>> Search the archives:
>>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

