Hi again Massimo,
please, show me as well what you have in  your targets$GErep

p.-

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Pedro Lopez-Romero <
plromero1.bioc@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Massimo, can you show me what you have in targets$Treatment?
>
> p.-
>
>   On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Massimo Pinto <pintarello@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I am reposting this only because, from the web archive of this list, it
>> appears that
>> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
>> Name: not available
>>
>> So perhaps my message was never seen on the list, but for those who opt to
>> receive individual message. Thank you.
>> Massimo
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Massimo Pinto <pintarello@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:02 PM
>> Subject: Agi4x44PreProcess: filtration of probes using filter.probes()
>> returns an empty RGList.
>> To: bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch
>>
>>
>> Greetings,
>> on a BioC2.4 installation using with the Agi4x44PreProcess library, I am
>> trying to invoke the filter.probes() filtration function to remove those
>> not-so-good probes.
>> Keeping in mind that my object looks like this:
>> > dim(ddNORM)
>> [1] 45015 4
>> > class(ddNORM)
>> [1] "RGList"
>> attr(,"package")
>> [1] "limma"
>>
>> when I apply the filtration function at the R prompt, using a syntax that
>> I
>> am copying from the Agi4x44PreProcess manual:
>>
>> >ddFILT = filter.probes(ddNORM, control = TRUE, wellaboveBG = TRUE,
>> isfound
>> = TRUE, wellaboveNEG = TRUE, sat = TRUE, PopnOL = TRUE, NonUnifOL = T, nas
>> =
>> TRUE, limWellAbove = 75, limISF = 75, limNEG = 75, limSAT = 75, limPopnOL
>> =
>> 75, limNonUnifOL = 75, limNAS = 100, makePLOT = TRUE, annotation.package =
>> "hgug4112a.db", flag.counts = T, targets)
>> I am getting an empty RGList as output:
>> FILTERING BY ControlType FLAG
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> PROBES BEFORE FILTERING: 45015
>> PROBES AFTER ControlType FILTERING: 43376
>> RAW DATA WITHOUT CONTROLS OUT : 43376
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> FILTERING BY IsWellAboveBG filterFLAG
>> FLAG FILTERING OPTIONS - FLAG OK = 1 - limWellAbove: 75 %
>> PROBES BEFORE FILTERING: 43376
>> PROBES AFTER QC FILTERING: 0
>> IsNOTWellAboveBG OUT : 0
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> [...]
>> so it looks to me like filtration by ControlType flag works ok, but
>> filtration via filter flag IsWellAboveBG returns an empty RGlist, which
>> remains empty from there onwards, as it seems:
>> > dim(ddFILT)
>> [1] 0 4
>> However, looking into the variable IsWellAboveBG somewhere in my RGList
>> ddNORM returns
>> > ddNORM$other$gIsWellAboveBG[8165:8178,]
>> 41745_1_3_21 41844_1_2_22 41744_1_2_23 41743_1_3_24
>> [1,] 1 1 1 1
>> [2,] 1 1 1 1
>> [3,] 0 0 0 0
>> [4,] 0 0 0 0
>> [5,] 1 1 1 1
>> [6,] 0 0 0 0
>> [7,] 1 1 1 1
>> [8,] 1 1 1 1
>> [9,] 1 1 1 1
>> [10,] 0 0 0 0
>> [11,] 0 0 0 0
>> [12,] 1 1 1 1
>> [13,] 1 1 1 1
>> [14,] 1 1 1 1
>>
>> suggesting that, in ddNORM, does have some entries have value 1 for flag
>> IsWellAboveBG. So why is filter.probes() throwing out all of my data from
>> ddNORM, assuming none is above background?
>> I have also tried to suppress filtation by IsWellAboveBG, but the outcome
>> is
>> the same upon the next filtration invoked by filter.probes(), i.e. an
>> empty
>> RGList.
>> Thank you very much indeed for any clues you may have. Clearly I cannot
>> see
>> clearly in the use of this function.
>> Yours
>> Massimo
>>
>> Massimo Pinto
>> Post Doctoral Research Fellow
>> Enrico Fermi Centre and Italian Public Health Research Institute (ISS),
>> Rome
>> http://claimid.com/massimopinto
>>
>>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioconductor mailing list
>> Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>> Search the archives:
>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
>>
>
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

