[BioC] [Bioc] RNAseq less sensitive than microarrays? Is it a statistical issue?

Lucia Peixoto luciap at iscb.org
Wed May 15 22:01:48 CEST 2013

Previous message: [BioC] PAM: Applying published classifiers
Next message: [BioC] [Bioc] RNAseq less sensitive than microarrays? Is it a statistical issue?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/attachments/20130515/697c4754/attachment.pl>

Previous message: [BioC] PAM: Applying published classifiers
Next message: [BioC] [Bioc] RNAseq less sensitive than microarrays? Is it a statistical issue?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Bioconductor mailing list