[BioC] scholarly reference for "don't draw PCA/heatmap dendrograms on DEGs"
Kevin Coombes
kevin.r.coombes at gmail.com
Mon Dec 9 15:05:22 CET 2013
I don't have a good reference either.
But you can easily simulate matrices full of IID standard normal data,
pick the "most differentially expressed" and show that this
noise/nonsense perfectly separates any two "groups" that you want to
pretend is present in the data.
-- Kevin
On 12/9/2013 8:55 AM, Lorena Pantano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't have any reference to give you.
>
> But my experience says that you don't get necessary a good heatmap
> separated by two conditions although you use only DE genes. Probably
> because many time,s results from DE genes are not so strong to separate the
> two groups, or because there is a systematically outlier in your comparison
> and get DE genes that are not true, or any other reason.
>
> I can say that I have done more than 50 DE analysis, and only once, I got a
> clear heatmap showing two groups. So, I guess there is something there.
>
> very interesting your initiative.
>
> cheers
>
> Lo
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Aaron Mackey <ajmackey at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> A colleague of mine is skeptical of my assertion that drawing sample-level
>> PCA plots and/or clustered heatmaps based only on differentially expressed
>> genes (DEGs) is a circular, self-fulfilling prophecy -- they assert that
>> there's no guarantee samples will cluster by condition (despite the fact
>> that the condition is exactly what drives selection of DEGs), and so hopes
>> to use the observed clustering as further "evidence" of the condition
>> effects. Rather than spend more time trying to explain statistical
>> concepts, I was hoping to checkmate the argument with a nice Nature Methods
>> review or somesuch. Any pointers?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> -Aaron
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioconductor mailing list
>> Bioconductor at r-project.org
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>> Search the archives:
>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
>>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list