[BioC] how to rank affy probesets by their probe-effect magnitude
robert.castelo at upf.edu
Mon Mar 5 23:14:09 CET 2012
On 3/5/12 8:02 PM, James W. MacDonald wrote:
> I'm not sure what you are looking to do with these data, but remember
> that the probe-specific effects in RMA are estimated as a nuisance
> variable, which are then excluded from computation of the expression
> value. So by definition the probesets should not be affected by
> probe-specific effects.
my understanding is that probesets in a microarray may have different
baseline expression levels due to probe-specific effects. if i recall
correctly this is illustrated in Fig. 1 of Zilliox and Irizarry (Nat.
Meth., 2007) and this, for instance, complicates the question of
determining whether a gene is expressed or not, which is tackled on that
i would like to assess somehow the agreement of these possibly different
expression baselines between different genes and i thought that
probe-specific effects would contain such information.
to be more specific, if we would assume a simple additive model
y_ij = probe_effect_i + sample_effect_j + noise_ij
i'd like to know what genes have more similar or more disparate probe
effects estimated as the probe_effect_i term in the previous linear
model and i thought such information could be extracted from PLMset objects.
More information about the Bioconductor