[BioC] Fwd: help

Heidi Dvinge heidi at ebi.ac.uk
Thu Aug 16 22:41:45 CEST 2012


Hello Rakesh,

> mam,
>> qDE.ttest <- ttestCtData(sr.norm[, 1:5], groups = files$Treatment[1:5],
> calibrator = "Control")
>
> it works well but it give ddct without entering referance gene name
>
I'm not sure I understand your question. There isn't a one single
reference gene across the entire array. For each gene, the result you get
is the difference between that gene in your treatment versus control,
taking into account that each gene is apparently present twice on each
array.

\Heidi

> my parent file look like this
>
>          File     Treatment
> 1 control.txt       Control
> 2   30min.txt short-revival
> 3     2hr.txt short-revival
> 4     4hr.txt short-revival
> 5     8hr.txt short-revival
> 6    12hr.txt  long-revival
> 7    16hr.txt  long-revival
> 8    24hr.txt  long-revival
> 9    48hr.txt  long-revival
>
>  the output  is
>> qDE.ttest
>       genes feature.pos      t.test      p.value  adj.p.value       ddCt
> FC meanCalibrator meanTarget      8   HSP90       B1;B2  14.1918260
> 1.951842e-06 2.537394e-05 -1.3640160 2.5740070         22.545   21.18098
>
>  11   NFK?      B9;B10 -11.7361946 7.215020e-06 4.689763e-05  1.5287282
> 0.3465828         23.785   25.31373
>  5    GPX1       C1;C2  -8.9176667 4.528284e-05 1.962256e-04  0.3621420
> 0.7780086         20.030   20.39214
>
>  6   HSP40       B3;B4   6.9024184 1.360182e-04 4.420590e-04 -3.3166287
> 9.9633346         22.745   19.42837
>
>  4  EEF1A1       A3;A4  -3.4429311 1.062206e-02 2.761736e-02  0.2375887
> 0.8481617         23.685   23.92259
>
>  7   HSP70     A11;A12   2.5713740 4.065094e-02 8.807704e-02 -0.6349518
> 1.5528858         17.015   16.38005
>  2    BCl2       A7;A8  -2.3134370 5.388469e-02 8.925181e-02  0.5828524
> 0.6676425         28.975   29.55785
>
>  9   HSPB1      A9;A10   2.2462289 5.492419e-02 8.925181e-02 -0.2327041
> 1.1750353         19.715   19.48230
>
>  12    RL4       A1;A2  -1.9695521 8.565504e-02 1.237239e-01  0.1956580
> 0.8731745         22.085   22.28066
>
>  3   DUSP1     B11;B12   1.9649979 1.128910e-01 1.467583e-01 -0.2893234
> 1.2220670         25.225   24.93568
>  13   TNF?       B7;B8   1.1632727 3.219916e-01 3.805355e-01 -1.1370484
> 2.1993061         34.585   33.44795
>
>  10    IL6       B5;B6   0.4165346 6.907912e-01 7.483571e-01 -0.1916190
> 1.1420446         33.990   33.79838
>
>  1     Bax       A5;A6  -0.4004043 7.496591e-01 7.496591e-01  0.2457399
> 0.8433831         37.810   38.05574
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bax and EEF1A1  are my referance gene.
> then how possible ddct for these two gene,the output is giving ddct for
> these too.
>
> and i want to make two group one is short-revival and second is
> long-revival then which script i use
>
> qDE.ttest <- ttestCtData(sr.norm[, 1:5], groups = files$Treatment[1:5],
> calibrator = "Control")
>                                      or
> qDE.ttest <- ttestCtData(sr.norm[, 1:9], groups = files$Treatment[1:9],
> calibrator = "Control")
>
> plz help me out mam
>
> Thanking You
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:56 PM, rakesh sharma
> <rakeshsaraswat691 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> thank you heidi i got it.
>> thankyou very much
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Heidi Dvinge <heidi at ebi.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Rakesh,
>>>
>>> >
>>> > sir,
>>> >   i am new on R language and dealing with light-cycler qpcr data
>>> using
>>> > HtqPCR package.everything goes all right till fold change.
>>> >
>>> > when i use t-test then following error occured.
>>> >
>>> >>  qDE.ttest <- ttestCtData(sr.norm[, 1:2], groups =
>>> files$Treatment[1:2],
>>> > calibrator = "Control")
>>> > Error in t.test.default(x[, g1], x[, g2], alternative = alternative,
>>> > paired
>>> > = paired,  :
>>> >   data are essentially constant
>>> >
>>> This error isn't actually from HTqPCR, but from the underlying t.test
>>> function. Have you checked whether these samples are indeed different?
>>> E.g. plot(getCt(sr.norm[, 1:2])). Does the sample apply to all your
>>> samples, e.g. qDE.ttest <- ttestCtData(sr.norm[, c(1,3)], groups =
>>> files$Treatment[c(1,3)], calibrator = "Control")
>>>
>>> It sounds like you may have a case where for example all replicates of
>>> a
>>> given gene in both your two samples has the Ct value 40, i.e. is
>>> undetected. Have you replaced such values with NA during your workflow?
>>>
>>> You can check the variation in your samples using e.g. plotCtVariation,
>>> or
>>> plotCtCor to look at the correlation between samples. In general, the
>>> HTqPCR plotting functions are quite useful for figuring our how your
>>> data
>>> 'behaves'. The vignette gives examples of how to use most of these
>>> plots,
>>> and they're all listed in figure 1.
>>>
>>> > when i select 4 samples then
>>> >
>>> > qDE.ttest <- ttestCtData(sr.norm[, 1:4], groups =
>>> files$Treatment[1:4],
>>> > calibrator = "Control")
>>> > Error in ttestCtData(sr.norm[, 1:4], groups = files$Treatment[1:4],
>>> > calibrator = "Control") :
>>> >   Two factor levels required for 'groups'
>>> >
>>>
>>> In this case you input 4 different groups (Control, 30min, 2hr, 4hr)
>>> into
>>> a 2-sided t-test. This never going to work; exactly 2 different groups
>>> are
>>> required. You will need to go back and figure out why the 2-sample
>>> approach you tried above doesn't work, i.e. where/why some of your
>>> samples
>>> are too similar to each other.
>>>
>>> HTH
>>> \Heidi
>>> >
>>> > my parent file look like this
>>> >
>>> > File    Treatment
>>> > control.txt    Control
>>> > 30min.txt    30min
>>> > 2hr.txt    2hr
>>> > 4hr.txt    4hr
>>> > 8hr.txt    8hr
>>> > 12hr.txt    12hr
>>> > 16hr.txt    16hr
>>> > 24hr.txt    24hr
>>> > 48hr.txt    48hr
>>> >
>>> > every sample have 26 features(13 replicate)
>>> >
>>> > so how i perform t- test on these data.
>>> > please sir help me out.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > thanking you
>>> >
>>> >       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Bioconductor mailing list
>>> > Bioconductor at r-project.org
>>> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>>> > Search the archives:
>>> > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Yours Sincerely
>> **Rakesh Sharma
>> C/o- Dr M Mukesh
>> National Fellow
>> DNAFU,
>> NBAGR (ICAR) - 132001
>> Haryana
>> INDIA*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Yours Sincerely
> **Rakesh Sharma
> C/o- Dr M Mukesh
> National Fellow
> DNAFU,
> NBAGR (ICAR) - 132001
> Haryana
> INDIA*
>



More information about the Bioconductor mailing list