[BioC] negative correlation?
Naomi Altman
naomi at stat.psu.edu
Wed Jun 29 19:28:38 CEST 2011
Oops again. The limma manual explains this. Too quick on the send
button as usual.
--Naomi
At 01:24 PM 6/29/2011, Naomi Altman wrote:
>I am running limma 2.8 on a technical replicate dye-swap
>design. Here is my design matrix:
>
>(Intercept) as.factor(targets$time)24h as.factor(targets$time)4h
>as.factor(targets$time)8h
>1 -1 0 0
> 0
>2 1 0 0
> 0
>3 -1 0 0
> 0
>4 1 0 0
> 0
>5 -1 0 1
> 0
>6 1 0 1
> 0
>7 -1 0 1
> 0
>8 1 0 1
> 0
>9 -1 0 0
> 1
>10 1 0 0
> 1
>11 -1 0 0
> 1
>12 1 0 0
> 1
>13 -1 1 0
> 0
>14 1 1 0
> 0
>15 -1 1 0
> 0
>16 1 1 0
> 0
>
>
>corfit <- duplicateCorrelation(MA, design=designTimeR,ndups = 1,
>block = targets$biorep)
>
>targets$biorep
> [1] 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8
>
>
> > corfit$con
>[1] -0.3414428
>
>Why am I getting a negative correlation between bio reps? Is this
>expected due to the dye swap?
>
>--Naomi
>
>_______________________________________________
>Bioconductor mailing list
>Bioconductor at r-project.org
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>Search the archives:
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list