[BioC] normalising with bad slides
James W. MacDonald
jmacdon at med.umich.edu
Mon Aug 30 16:01:15 CEST 2010
Hi Andrew,
On 8/30/2010 3:12 AM, Andrew Einhorn wrote:
> I have a set of 15 human gene st arrays that I am normalising. From
> analysis of the raw data, I can see that two of the slides are of very poor
> quality (signs of rna degradation, low pearson correlations etc). If I do
> an rma normalisation and include these two slides, will they effect the
> normalisation of the other slides. In other words, is it necessary to
> ignore these two slides in the rma step, or will including them make no
> difference.
It *should* have minimal repercussions if you include the two bad
slides. The normalization relies on the median value for each probe, so
your poor quality chips will not likely be used.
In addition, the model fitting process uses medians as well, so assuming
that your poor quality chips return outlier values for each probeset,
they won't be used for the model fit either.
Best,
Jim
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
--
James W. MacDonald, M.S.
Biostatistician
Douglas Lab
University of Michigan
Department of Human Genetics
5912 Buhl
1241 E. Catherine St.
Ann Arbor MI 48109-5618
734-615-7826
**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list