[BioC] Limma lmFit function and spot quality weights
Gordon K Smyth
smyth at wehi.EDU.AU
Wed Jul 29 01:06:09 CEST 2009
Dear Benoit,
It doesn't seem to me to be desirable to place restrictions on the weights
that people can specify to lmFit. In some cases it is desirable to be
able to make comparisons for probes with only one available sample per
group.
On the other hand, this does means that you are responsible for the
weights you create, and you may get poor results if you input weights that
are innappropriate for the data.
Best wishes
Gordon
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:41:06 +0200
> From: Benoit <benoit.loup at jouy.inra.fr>
> Subject: [BioC] Limma lmFit function and spot quality weights
> To: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
>
> Hello,
> I'm using Limma to assess differential expression on double colour
> microarray data and have a question about the lmFit function.
> When I fit linear model using lmFit, as I understood, the function uses
> the weights extracted from the MA object when present and/or specified.
> Thus, I tried fitting with and without the spot quality weights and I
> found different results (not very surprising in fact).
> In fact, when I used weights, zero weighted spots seemed to be removed
> from the analysis and it's here that I have a problem.
>
> For my experiment, I compare two groups (control vs treated) in a
> classical design experiment "Two Groups: Common Reference" as describe
> in the Limma documentation.
>
> design=modelMatrix(targets,ref="ref")
> design
> fit=lmFit(MA,design,weights=MA$weights)
> /alternative without weights : fit=lmFit(MA,design,weights=NULL)/
> cont.matrix=makeContrasts(pollutedVScontrol=polluted-control,polluted,control,levels=design)
> cont.matrix
> fit2=contrasts.fit(fit,cont.matrix)
> fit2=eBayes(fit2)
> res=toptable(coef=1,number=15744,fit=fit2,genelist=fit2$genes,adjust.method="BH",A=fit2$Amean,eb=fit2,p.value=0.01)
>
> The difference between the analysis with and without weights is that
> when I use weights new genes highly differentially expressed appeared.
> When I control these genes, in fact they correspond to spots that are
> flagged (0) on the majority of the arrays (i.e. only one weight at 1 for
> the control and one weight at 1 for the treated). Thus for these genes
> the comparison is performed only one "control array" versus one "treated
> array".
> So is it possible to specify to lmFit that there must be a minimum of
> "1" weights or a maximum "0" weights per groups of array ?
>
> Thank you for any help you can bring me.
>
> Benoit
>
> --
> Benoit Loup, PhD
> UMR Biologie du D?veloppement et Reproduction
> Diff?renciation des Gonades et Perturbations
> INRA ? Domaine de Vilvert
> B?timent Jacques Poly
> 78350 Jouy en Josas
> France
>
> Tel: 33 1 34 65 25 38
> Fax: 33 1 34 65 22 41
> E-mail: benoit.loup at jouy.inra.fr
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list