[BioC] genefiltering before or after the normalization?
Wolfgang Huber
huber at ebi.ac.uk
Fri Jul 11 00:36:03 CEST 2008
Hi Abhilash
> I am working with single color data from Agilent platform. After the limma
> analysis the adjusted p values were higher than 5% of FDR. At this instance
> I am thinking of filtering the genes using genefilter. As my data set
> contains only raw intensities of normal and test before the normalization,
> where I am uisng 'normalizeBetweenArrays' command after log transforming the
> data.
> In this scenario I am quite confused whether I should use the filter
> functions prior to normalization of after the normalization but efore
> fitting the linear model?
> As my data is not an expressionSet I cannot use the nonfilter commands, in
> this case any suggestions of using other filtering methods?
>
> Appreciate the suggestions
>
Such filtering is performed after normalisation, but it is essential
that the filter criterion does *not use the sample annotations*. E.g.
you can use for each gene the overall variance or IQR across the experiment.
If x is a matrix with rows=genes and columns=samples, then this can be
as simple as:
rs = rowSds(x)
fx = fx[ rs > quantile(rs, lambda), ]
where rowSds is in the genefilter package, and lambda is a parameter
between 0 and 1 that contains your belief in what fraction of probes on
the array correspond to target molecules that are never expressed in the
conditions you study.
Also note that after such filtering, strictly speaking, the nominal
p-values from the subsequent testing could be too small - but one can
show that in typical microarray applications the bias is negligible
(compared to the impact of other effects), and in any case the p-values
can be used for ranking.
Best wishes
Wolfgang
--
----------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Huber, EMBL-EBI, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/huber
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list