[BioC] Spam on BioC (was Re: Wannt new PPorshe or BMW?)
engrav at u.washington.edu
Wed Dec 19 06:40:57 CET 2007
Am I serious?
The bigger issue?
Well, I rather agree with <atossava at cc.helsinki.fi>
And, it is not an obstructed airway so we need not intubate so in that sense
it is not serious but
We did deal with the security certificate and
We did deal with the junk email problem and
It is fun to watch pure Bio email go by so in a way I am serious
Can we stop Bio.Spam?
Is Bio spoofing preventable?
Maybe not, maybe Bio.Spam Bio.Spoofing is inevitable, unstoppable, how life
But worthy of discussion (although may have been discussed long ago as
> From: Atro Tossavainen <atossava at cc.helsinki.fi>
> Reply-To: <Atro.Tossavainen at helsinki.fi>
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:36:51 +0200 (EET)
> To: "bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch" <bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch>
> Subject: [BioC] Spam on BioC (was Re: Wannt new PPorshe or BMW?)
>> Are you serious?
> I think the bigger issue is that the Bioconductor list has recently been
> seeing a fairly large amount of mails that the filters at phil*.ethz.ch
> have analysed as spam but nonetheless allowed to pass through. Has
> something changed @ ETH? In the list configuration perhaps?
> Atro Tossavainen (Mr.) / The Institute of Biotechnology at
> Systems Analyst, Techno-Amish & / the University of Helsinki, Finland,
> +358-9-19158939 UNIX Dinosaur / employs me, but my opinions are my own.
> < URL : http : / / www . helsinki . fi / %7E atossava / > NO FILE ATTACHMENTS
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> Search the archives:
More information about the Bioconductor