[BioC] Experimental Design
Naomi Altman
naomi at stat.psu.edu
Wed Jan 11 04:09:48 CET 2006
The best design depends on which comparisons are of most interest to you.
If you have 2 genotypes (wt and mutant) with 4 replicates of each and
your objective is to compare wt to mutant, you are probably fine with
a dye-swap design with 4 arrays, 1 wt and 1 mut on each array.
If the mutants are all different genotypes, then you need to
replicate the mutants. (In my opinion, this should be a separate set
of plants - or at least a separate RNA extraction). The best design
depends on which comparisons are of most interest - comparisons among
the mutants, or comparisons of each mutant to wt. I cannot think of
a situation in which I would want to use the loop design you have
indicated below.
The main principle to remember is that the comparisons with most
power are the 2 samples on the same array.
--Naomi
At 05:01 PM 1/10/2006, Khan, Sohail wrote:
>Dear list,
>
>I have the following samples:
>
>wt-1 mut-1
>wt-2 mut-2
>wt-3 mut-3
>wt-4 mut-4
>
>The wt and the mut come from different plants. Question is, which is
>a better design??
>To pool all the wt and used that as a common reference or use a loop
>design as follows.
>cy3 cy5
>wt-1 mut-1
>mut-1 wt-2
>wt-2 mut-2
>mut-2 wt-3
>wt-3 mut-3
>mut-3 wt-4
>wt-4 mut-4
>mut-4 wt-1
>In addition, which Bioconductor package can be used the analysis of
>the loop design? Thank you for any suggestions.
>
>
>
>
>Sohail Khan
>Scientific Programmer
>COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
>Genome Research Center
>500 Sunnyside Boulevard
>Woodbury, NY 11797
>(516)422-4076
>
>_______________________________________________
>Bioconductor mailing list
>Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
Naomi S. Altman 814-865-3791 (voice)
Associate Professor
Dept. of Statistics 814-863-7114 (fax)
Penn State University 814-865-1348 (Statistics)
University Park, PA 16802-2111
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list