[BioC] (Limma) different toptable results for the same dataset using 2 different designs
Gordon Smyth
smyth at wehi.edu.au
Wed Dec 7 05:43:38 CET 2005
At 10:37 PM 6/12/2005, Celine Carret wrote:
>Dear gordon, thank you very much for your answer.
>However, when I do that, I end up with the table below:
[code deleted]
> M t P.Value B
>>311 -3.997113 -13.961019 0.5794648 -0.5112598
>>1327 -1.461801 -11.334987 0.5794648 -0.6889117
>>113 -1.690073 -10.880814 0.5794648 -0.7308602
>>4408 -3.066882 -10.019535 0.5794648 -0.8232774
>>1825 -3.576034 -9.781223 0.5794648 -0.8523026
>>1224 -1.099785 -9.445264 0.5794648 -0.8961448
>>289 -2.800736 -9.306995 0.5794648 -0.9152559
>>288 -1.689312 -8.759499 0.5794648 -0.9977157
>>2892 -2.513426 -8.675603 0.5794648 -1.0113879
>>3311 3.005392 8.377018 0.5794648 -1.0625077
This isn't a surprise. Your previous email showed that this is the table
you must get.
>It does solve one problem, which is obatining 2 similar toptables whatever
>the design lay-out, but it doesn't explain why I have those awfully wrong
>values...
>Would have an idea by any chance?
>
>All the best,
>Celine
If you claim the answers are wrong, you rather do need to give a reason why
you think that.
Best wishes
Gordon
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list