[BioC] Limma with common Reference Design
michael watson (IAH-C)
michael.watson at bbsrc.ac.uk
Mon Oct 11 10:09:14 CEST 2004
Hi Sean
I want to do in limma what I would have normally done using mt.teststat
in the multtest package - that is perform a moderated t-test for each
row of my data, testing for the difference between the two groups (where
one group is T1/Ref and the other is T2/Ref), adjusting for the FDR. It
looks like I do need the contrasts matrix, and the coefficient of
interest is T1-T2.
So If I use design matrix
T1 T2
1 0 1
2 0 1
3 0 1
4 1 0
5 1 0
6 1 0
And a contrasts matrix so:
T1 T2 T1-T2
T1 1 0 1
T2 0 1 -1
Then lmfit(), eBayes and topTable, as in the user guide, that's the
limma equivalent of a moderated t-test for each row as described above?
Cheers
Mick
-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Davis [mailto:sdavis2 at mail.nih.gov]
Sent: 08 October 2004 17:31
To: michael watson (IAH-C)
Cc: Bioconductor
Subject: Re: [BioC] Limma with common Reference Design
On Oct 8, 2004, at 10:57 AM, michael watson (IAH-C) wrote:
>
> Is this right? From reading the examples, I think it is, but I am not
> sure what the advantage is of having the contrasts matrix as well as
> the design matrix, adding the contrasts matrix certainly gives me
> different results to just using the design matrix alone. Hmmmmm.
>
Mick,
The answer depends on what you want to get? I am assuming that you
actually want to have T1-T2, so you do need the contrast matrix. You
don't get that quantity directly from the design matrix, so there is no
comparable answer using a design matrix alone as compared to including
a contrast matrix. The first two coefficients for each should be the
same, though.
Sean
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list