[BioC] limma imageplot
Gordon Smyth
smyth at wehi.edu.au
Tue Mar 16 02:56:47 MET 2004
imageplot, and limma generally, assumes that your expression data is in
standard order. This means that ngrid.r, ngrid.c, nspot.r, nspot.c are in
that order as slowest to fastest moving indices. If your data is not in
that order, you have to re-order it.
You an re-order data to change the dimension orders using a judicious usage
of the dim and aperm functions, but this is not part of limma.
Gordon
At 12:31 PM 16/03/2004, Anna Cao wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I$B!G(Bm using the imageplot function in limma to look for spatial
>artifacts on
>the array. I used oligo arrays with a grid dimension of 5(x-axis) x
>12(y-axis) and spot dimension of 30 (x-axis) x 9 (y-axis). I use layout =
>ngrid.r=5,ngrid.c=12,nspot.r=30,nspot.c=9. My genes in the raw file are
>listed in the order from 1 --> 16200 and the order is shown below:
>
>Actual Spot dimension alignment (30 x 9 so that each piece of grid has 270
>spots):
>1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 $B"*(B 30
>31 32$B!D(B.. and so on
>
>But the imageplot shows the spot dimension in the order below (a sample
>grid):
>9 18.............270th spot
>8 17
>7 16
>6 15
>5 14
>4 13
>3 12
>2 11
>1 10.............261th spot
>
>As for the Grid dimension (5x12 so that there's 60 grid total):
>The original grid dimension alignment is:
>01 02 03 04 05
>06 07 08 09 10
>11
>16
>21
>26
>............60th grid
>
>The image plot shows grid dimension in the order below:
>12 24.......60th grid
>11 23
>10 22
>9 21
>8 20
>7 19
>6 18
>5 17
>4 16
>3 15
>2 14
>1 13........49th grid
>
>Is there anyway I can change the dimension order so it fits the actual spot
>and grid alignment?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Anna
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list