[BioC] Statistical comparison of low replicate affy data

[Matthew Hannah]

I realise that with tech reps you would underestimate FP's but as I said 
in this case they are biological reps. The data is from 3 growthroom exp
over a 6 month period. That was why I was suprised at how few FP's there
were. In fact for consistent 1.5 fold changes the numbers are equally
impressive with only around 15 FP's for RMA and 50 for GCRMA. What do
people think about this?