[BioC] limma and paired data
Gordon Smyth
smyth at wehi.edu.au
Tue Apr 20 04:22:31 CEST 2004
At 03:09 AM 20/04/2004, Danielle Fletcher wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am using limma to analyse a 2-colour microarray experiment. There are 2
>treatments and 4 replicates in each of these groups. Each replicate is
>paired to a replicate in the otehr treatment group. Each sample was
>hybridised with a reference, so 8 slides in total.
>
>The targets file looks like this (hopefuly that will make it clearer):
>SlideNumber Name FileName Cy3 Cy5
>1 1M 1.gpr monolayer ref
>2 1P 5b.gpr pellet ref
>3 2M 2.gpr monolayer ref
>4 2P 7.gpr pellet ref
>5 3M 3.gpr monolayer ref
>6 3P 6.gpr pellet ref
>7 4M B.gpr monolayer ref
>8 4P A.gpr pellet ref
>
>Initially my design matrix looked like this:
>
> Sample-Ref Monolayer-Pellet
>1M 1 0
>1P 1 1
>2M 1 0
>2P 1 1
>3M 1 0
>3P 1 1
>4M 1 0
>4P 1 1
>
>but thinking about it again, i don't think this takes into account the
>paired nature of the data. I am sure that the answer is probably a simple one,
There is no simple answer. There was a big discussion about this in
Bioconductor very recently, please look at the list archives.
In the very latest versions of limma, there is a new argument 'block' in
duplicateCorrelation() and lmFit() to handle a blocking structure like you
describe. This feature is however very lightly documented so far and so is
offered on a user beware basis. In your case, block=c(1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4).
Gordon
> but I am not sure what the best solution is. I would appreciate any advice.
>
>Thanks in advance
>
>Danielle
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list