On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Julian Gehring <julian.gehring@embl.de>
wrote:

> Hi Herve,
>
>
>  2) A 'dropMcols' or 'dropmcols' method with signature 'GRanges' that is
>>> a wrapper for
>>>    mcols(x) <- NULL
>>>
>>
>> How about setMcols(), which is more general than dropmcols()?
>>
>>
> Do you mean a function like:
>
>   setMcols <- function(x, value = NULL) {
>     mcols(x) = value
>     return(x)
>   }
>
> I'd be fine with this.  However, some argued before that setting to NULL
> may be counterintuitive for non-advanced users.
>
>
Probably best to have both setMcols and dropMcols.



> Best wishes
> Julian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor@r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.
> science.biology.informatics.conductor
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

