That is pretty weird.  Since this is a segmentation fault in Bowtie,
perhaps there are resource demands which are only satisfied on perceval
(tmp space, #cores).

Presumably this worked when Bioc was released, so what have you changed in
between?

Best,
Kasper


On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Michael Stadler <michael.stadler@fmi.ch>
wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> I'm cc'ing the list; maybe somebody else has experienced differences
> between petty and perceval.
>
> Rbowtie release (1.4.5) is not building under OS X 10.6.8 (petty).
>
> Rbowtie release (1.4.5) and development (1.5.5) are virtually identical
> (only DESCRIPTION and NEWS differ).
>
> The development version builds without problems on perceval, but the
> release version fails on petty:
>
> http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/Rbowtie/perceval-buildsrc.html
>
> http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/release/bioc-LATEST/Rbowtie/petty-buildsrc.html
>
> The only difference I can make out from the node info pages is that
> perceval has an additional section on "C++11 compiler" that is lacking
> from petty's NodeInfo page.
>
> Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce the issue, both Rbowtie 1.4.5 and
> 1.5.5 build successfully under OS X 10.6.8 and 10.7.5 using llvm-gcc-4.2.
>
> Do you have any idea what else could be different between petty and
> perceval?
>
> Thank you,
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

