On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Dan Tenenbaum <dtenenba@fhcrc.org> wrote:

> Hello Henrik,
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Henrik Bengtsson <hb@biostat.ucsf.edu>wrote:
>
>> According to
>>
>>  http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/EBImage.html
>>
>> the EBImage package is available for download as this:
>>
>> Package Downloads:
>> Package source  EBImage_3.6.0.tar.gz
>> Windows 32-bit binary   EBImage_3.6.0.zip
>> Windows 64-bit binary   EBImage_3.6.0.zip
>> MacOS X 10.5 (Leopard) binary   Not Available
>>
>> However, if you download the EBImage_3.6.0.zip file for Windows 64-bit
>> binary, it is for i386 (and not 'arch=x64').  Should that URL be
>> removed?
>>
>>
> This has been on my list to get to for some time--I will take care of it
> today.
>
> By the way, how did you get to that page? There is a new package page:
>
> http://www.bioconductor.org/help/bioc-views/release/bioc/html/EBImage.html
>
> This page has the same issue--except there is only one Windows binary
> available, incorrectly labelled as for both 32 and 64-bit.
>
>
Just to follow up--the fix for this issue has now propagated throughout our
website.
Both the old- and new-style package detail pages will report the correct
Windows architectures available (32-bit, 64-bit, or both) for all packages
(it was previously reporting incorrect architectures for a small number of
packages).

Dan

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

