Hello Seth,

I'm contributing a new package now (it is under revision), and the current
version number is 1.0.2. Your message means that I'll need to re-numerate
the package version for 1.1.0 or 0.99.0, right? If I not change the version
number, it will not enter the next BioC release?

Many Thanks!

Gustavo


On 9/6/07, Seth Falcon <sfalcon@fhcrc.org> wrote:
>
> Hello BioC package maintainers,
>
> I want to remind you all of the version number policy:
>
>    http://wiki.fhcrc.org/bioc/Version_Numbering_Standards
>
> Packages that are in the BioC 2.0 release need not take any action; we
> will do the version number bumping as part of the release process.
>
> Newly contributed packages must have either:
>
>   1) a version number >= 1.1.0
>
> OR
>
>   2) a version number >= 0.99.0
>
> Option #2 is preferred for new packages because we will bump to 1.0.0
> for the release.  Option #1 is fine, but such packages will go to
> 1.2.0 for release and 1.3.0 for the subsequent devel cycle.
>
> Please post to bioc-devel with questions if you are at all unsure.
>
> Thanks,
>
> + seth
>
>
> --
> Seth Falcon | Computational Biology | Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research
> Center
> BioC: http://bioconductor.org/
> Blog: http://userprimary.net/user/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>



-- 
*********************************************************

     "The truth you speak has no past and no
       future. It is, and that's all it needs to be."

     "A verdade que você fala não tem passado
      nem futuro. Ela é,  e isso é tudo que ela
      precisa ser."

                         Richard Bach

*********************************************************


   Gustavo Henrique Esteves

   Departamento de Matemática e Estatística,
   Centro de Ciências e Tecnologia,
   Universidade Estadual da Paraíba.

   e-mail: gesteves@uepb.edu.br

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

