[Bioc-devel] data extension preference

Kern, Lori Lor|@Shepherd @end|ng |rom Ro@we||P@rk@org
Tue Jan 3 17:24:50 CET 2023

Personally:  I think it depends on the use case and the type of data being provided as well as the size.  Raw data is probably more adaptable for various usage even extending beyond expected use however it can be large;  processed data can be saved compressed and greatly reduce package/data size.  Again it will largely depend on what you are doing with the data provided.

Lori Shepherd - Kern

Bioconductor Core Team

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center

Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

Elm & Carlton Streets

Buffalo, New York 14263

From: Bioc-devel <bioc-devel-bounces using r-project.org> on behalf of Park, Adam Keebum <sein.park using psu.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 11:42 PM
To: bioc-devel using r-project.org <bioc-devel using r-project.org>
Subject: [Bioc-devel] data extension preference

Dear whom it may concern,

I want to check if reviewers have a preference in data formats for data included in a package.
Is rda strongly recommended over csv?


        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Bioc-devel using r-project.org mailing list

This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

More information about the Bioc-devel mailing list