[Bioc-devel] files present in github repository
Carlos A. Catania (AKA Harpo)
h@rpom@xx @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Tue Sep 1 13:45:21 CEST 2020
Thanks for your answer Martin, we will follow your suggestion of using a
branch. It sounds the simplest way.
Carlos A. Catania (AKA Harpo)
El lun., 31 ago. 2020 a las 14:14, Martin Morgan (<mtmorgan.bioc using gmail.com>)
escribió:
> A reasonable strategy is to create a branch ('master' for submission) that
> contains just the package source; use another branch for additional
> functionality.
>
> After submission, your package is cloned to the git.bioconductor.org
> repository and you could maintain it from an arbitrary branch in your
> repository, so your github 'master' could again contain arbitrary files
> (branches are easily renamed in git).
>
> Martin
>
> On 8/31/20, 8:11 AM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Carlos A. Catania (AKA
> Harpo)" <bioc-devel-bounces using r-project.org on behalf of harpomaxx using gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi to all,
> My team is just about to submit a new package to Bioconductor and we
> have
> a question about the files included in the github repository:
> According to
> Bioconductor Guidelines for package submission, the repo should not
> contain
> unnecessary files other than the required for package installation.
> However, we have two files in our repo that are not strictly part of
> the
> package:
>
> codecov.yml
> .travis.yml
>
> These files are essential for our continuous integration process. I
> want to
> know if we should remove them before submitting to Bio, or is it ok if
> we
> left them?.
>
> Best
>
> Carlos A. Catania (AKA Harpo)
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the Bioc-devel
mailing list