[Bioc-devel] files present in github repository

Carlos A. Catania (AKA Harpo) h@rpom@xx @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Tue Sep 1 13:45:21 CEST 2020


Thanks for your answer Martin, we will follow your suggestion of using a
branch. It sounds the simplest way.

Carlos A. Catania (AKA Harpo)


El lun., 31 ago. 2020 a las 14:14, Martin Morgan (<mtmorgan.bioc using gmail.com>)
escribió:

> A reasonable strategy is to create a branch ('master' for submission) that
> contains just the package source; use another branch for additional
> functionality.
>
> After submission, your package is cloned to the git.bioconductor.org
> repository and you could maintain it from an arbitrary branch in your
> repository, so your github 'master' could again contain arbitrary files
> (branches are easily renamed in git).
>
> Martin
>
> On 8/31/20, 8:11 AM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Carlos A. Catania (AKA
> Harpo)" <bioc-devel-bounces using r-project.org on behalf of harpomaxx using gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>     Hi to all,
>     My team is just about to submit a new package to Bioconductor and we
> have
>     a question about the files included in the github repository:
> According to
>     Bioconductor Guidelines for package submission, the repo should not
> contain
>     unnecessary files other than the required for package installation.
>     However, we have two files in our repo that are not strictly part of
> the
>     package:
>
>     codecov.yml
>     .travis.yml
>
>     These files are essential for our continuous integration process. I
> want to
>     know if we should remove them before submitting to Bio, or is it ok if
> we
>     left them?.
>
>     Best
>
>     Carlos A. Catania (AKA Harpo)
>
>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Bioc-devel using r-project.org mailing list
>     https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



More information about the Bioc-devel mailing list