[Bioc-devel] package RBGL requires CRAN dependency on devel branch
Aaron Lun
|n||n|te@monkey@@w|th@keybo@rd@ @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Tue Mar 26 05:45:26 CET 2019
My 2 cents - API-breaking changes to BH are no more of an issue than
breaking changes to any other CRAN package. We just hope that it doesn't
happen too often and we deal with it when the time comes; that's the
whole point of getting frequent release builds to check for these cases.
If we were discussing a package that distributed a shared library, then
greater concern would be warranted if updates to the library resulted in
ABI incompatibilities. This could result in very cryptic errors at link
time, load time, or possibly segmentation faults, who knows.
But BH is a header-only library, so breaking changes will most likely
cause compilation errors that are obvious and easy to fix. Well, easy
enough if you were able to write C++ code in the first place.
-A
On 25/03/2019 08:39, Vincent Carey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:57 AM Kasper Daniel Hansen <
> kasperdanielhansen using gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There are no issues with depending on CRAN packages.
>>
>> But I would advise caution. On one hand it is great that boost gets
>> updated regularly. On the other hand, it could lead to incompatibilities
>> with RBGL and then you have to update that package rapidly. Also - and this
>> is something we could consider addressing - the CRAN imports of Bioc are
>> not locked down. By which I mean, you release RBGL in Bioconductor X. After
>> release (or perhaps even after next Bioc release) BH is updated in a
>> non-backwards compatible way and now the old code is hosed. Having said
>> that, so far we have been ignoring it (I think) and the same issue arises
>> with Rcpp.
>>
>> Do you have any idea how often Boost breaks compatibility? I would
>> strongly advise to download the last couple of BH releases and test with
>> RBGL. While kind of irrelevant in some sense, it will give you an idea of
>> how fast Boost / BH evolves.
>>
>
> These are good points. In this particular case I believe that Boost Graph
> Library evolves very slowly and
> backwards compatibility is not endangered. It is an early component of
> Boost. On the other hand, BH has
> no obligation to provide the graph (BGL) headers, and I believe that in
> early incarnations of BH, some headers
> needed for RBGL were not there. So there are maintenance vulnerabilities
> to this approach, but I think it is better
> if we stick with the maintained BH as long as this works. Should this
> approach fail (and your scenario of
> CRAN package changes breaking bioc must be kept in mind) we can go back to
> tarball distribution if necessary.
>
>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:03 AM Martin Morgan <mtmorgan.bioc using gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ...also Bioconductor knows all about CRAN -- see the repositories
>>> returned by
>>>
>>>> BiocManager::repositories()
>>> BioCsoft
>>> "https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.9/bioc"
>>> BioCann
>>> "https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.9/data/annotation"
>>> BioCexp
>>> "https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.9/data/experiment"
>>> BioCworkflows
>>> "https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.9/workflows"
>>> CRAN
>>> "https://cran.rstudio.com"
>>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/25/19, 7:42 AM, "Martin Morgan" <mtmorgan.bioc using gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think the usual incantation in configure files is ${R_HOME}/bin/R
>>> ... R_HOME is the path to R set by the command that starts to build or
>>> install the package, whereas Rscript is found on the search path.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On 3/25/19, 7:33 AM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Vincent Carey" <
>>> bioc-devel-bounces using r-project.org on behalf of stvjc using channing.harvard.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The error on linux for 3.9:
>>>
>>>
>>> ##############################################################################
>>>
>>> ##############################################################################
>>> ###
>>> ### Running command:
>>> ###
>>> ### /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/R/bin/R CMD INSTALL RBGL
>>> ###
>>>
>>> ##############################################################################
>>>
>>> ##############################################################################
>>>
>>>
>>> * installing to library ‘/home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/R/library’
>>> * installing *source* package ‘RBGL’ ...
>>> ** using staged installation
>>> checking R package BH ... no
>>> configure: error: R package BH not found.
>>> ERROR: configuration failed for package ‘RBGL’
>>> * removing ‘/home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/R/library/RBGL’
>>> * restoring previous ‘/home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/R/library/RBGL’
>>>
>>> Note that BiocParallel also uses BH and succeeds
>>>
>>> configure: creating ./config.status
>>> config.status: creating src/Makevars
>>> ** libs
>>> g++ -std=gnu++11 -I"/home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/R/include"
>>> -DNDEBUG
>>> -I"/home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/R/library/BH/include"
>>> -I/usr/local/include -fpic -g -O2 -Wall -c ipcmutex.cpp -o
>>> ipcmutex.o
>>> In file included from
>>>
>>> /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/R/library/BH/include/boost/random/detail/integer_log2.hpp:19:0,
>>> from
>>>
>>> /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/R/library/BH/include/boost/random/detail/large_arithmetic.hpp:19,
>>> from
>>>
>>> /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/R/library/BH/include/boost/random/detail/const_mod.hpp:23,
>>> from
>>>
>>> /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/R/library/BH/include/boost/random/detail/seed_impl.hpp:26,
>>> from
>>>
>>> /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/R/library/BH/include/boost/random/mersenne_twister.hpp:30,
>>> from
>>>
>>> /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/R/library/BH/include/boost/uuid/random_generator.hpp:17,
>>>
>>> So could it be an issue with the configure script?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 7:22 AM Samuela Pollack <
>>> spollack using jimmy.harvard.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Dear Bioconductor,
>>> >
>>> > The devel version of package RBGL is flunking build.
>>> >
>>> > This package has been modified to include header files in the
>>> CRAN
>>> > package 'BH' instead of using a local tarball of the header
>>> files. We
>>> > consider this an improvement because the 'BH' maintainers
>>> update their
>>> > package every time a new version of boost is released, but
>>> rebuilding
>>> > the included tarball is unreliable.
>>> >
>>> > Is it possible to request inclusion of a CRAN package
>>> dependency in a
>>> > Bioconductor package? If not, how would Bioconductor recommend
>>> we handle
>>> > this?
>>> >
>>> > (Full disclosure: the BH package has all the header files for
>>> all of
>>> > boost. This is a lot more disk space then we need, because we
>>> only need
>>> > the BGL.)
>>> >
>>> > thanks,
>>> >
>>> > - Sam
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 3/22/19 7:28 AM, Morgan, Martin wrote:
>>> > > External Email - Use Caution
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks for the explanation and exemplary detective work. Will
>>> you push
>>> > these changes to the release and devel branches of RBGL? I've
>>> given you
>>> > permissions... Martin
>>> > >
>>> > > On 3/22/19, 5:15 AM, "Samuela Pollack" <
>>> spollack using jimmy.harvard.edu>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > We have a temporary fix which we believe will alleviate
>>> the
>>> > difficulty.
>>> > >
>>> > > The only routine in RBGL that does not compile under the
>>> LLVM-9.0
>>> > system
>>> > > is the routine that implements betweenness connectivity
>>> clustering.
>>> > This
>>> > > seems to be a rarely-used routine, so we have
>>> temporarily removed it
>>> > > from RBGL and put in a message explaining how users may
>>> replace it
>>> > easily.
>>> > >
>>> > > I have contacted Professor Jeremy Siek at in Bloomington
>>> to discuss
>>> > how
>>> > > best to proceed. It is possible this will have to be
>>> fixed in BGL,
>>> > > probably not in time for boost 1.70.
>>> > >
>>> > > For clarity: the incompatibility is not in clang. The
>>> > incompatibility is
>>> > > in the llvm c++ standard library. Mac users who build
>>> with clang
>>> > will be
>>> > > fine, as long as they don't link in the llvm C++ stdlib,
>>> which most
>>> > > wouldn't think to do and Apple does not encourage.
>>> > >
>>> > > We hope this will be sufficient for now.
>>> > >
>>> > > - Sam
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On 3/22/19 4:18 AM, Morgan, Martin wrote:
>>> > > > External Email - Use Caution
>>> > > >
>>> > > > What's the status for RBGL?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks, Martin
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On 3/22/19, 3:57 AM, "Prof Brian Ripley" <
>>> ripley using stats.ox.ac.uk>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > clang 8.0.0 is now released, and these fail there
>>> too (and
>>> > break about
>>> > > > 50 CRAN packages which depend on them).
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Reminder: this is with clang's native libc++, as
>>> documented
>>> > at
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>> https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/Rconfig/r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang
>>> > > >
>>> > > > We really need fixes in both 3.8 and 3.9.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > BDR
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On 28/02/2019 18:52, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>> > > > > These packages fail to install with clang
>>> 8.0.0rc3, which
>>> > is supposed to
>>> > > > > be near-final (it is overdue for release).
>>> (AFAIR they
>>> > did install with
>>> > > > > rc1.) In both cases the problems are with
>>> Boost.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > RBGL 1.95.1
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > In file included from bbc.cpp:1:
>>> > > > > In file included from ./RBGL.hpp:7:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/iostream:38:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/ios:216:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/__locale:15:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/string:505:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > > > >
>>> /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/string_view:176:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/__string:57:
>>> > > > >
>>> /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2494:5:
>>> > error:
>>> > > > > static_assert
>>> > > > > failed due to requirement
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> '__is_forward_iterator<boost::detail::undirected_edge_iter<std::__1::__list_iterator<boost::list_edge<unsigned
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > long,
>>> boost::property<boost::edge_weight_t, double,
>>> > > > >
>>> boost::property<boost::edge_centrality_t, double,
>>> > > > > boost::no_property> > >,
>>> > > > > void *>,
>>> > boost::detail::edge_desc_impl<boost::undirected_tag,
>>> > > > > unsigned
>>> > > > > long>, long> >::value' "std::max_element
>>> requires a
>>> > ForwardIterator"
>>> > > > >
>>> > static_assert(__is_forward_iterator<_ForwardIterator>::value,
>>> > > > > ^
>>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> > > > >
>>> > rbgl_trimmed_boost_1_61_0/boost/graph/bc_clustering.hpp:132:26:
>>> note: in
>>> > > > > instantiation of function template
>>> specialization
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> 'std::__1::max_element<boost::detail::undirected_edge_iter<std::__1::__list_iterator<boost::list_edge<unsigned
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > long,
>>> boost::property<boost::edge_weight_t, double,
>>> > > > >
>>> boost::property<boost::edge_centrality_t, double,
>>> > > > > boost::no_property> > >,
>>> > > > > void *>,
>>> > boost::detail::edge_desc_impl<boost::undirected_tag,
>>> > > > > unsigned
>>> > > > > long>, long>,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> boost::indirect_cmp<boost::adj_list_edge_property_map<boost::undirected_tag,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > double, double &, unsigned long,
>>> > > > > boost::property<boost::edge_weight_t,
>>> > > > > double,
>>> boost::property<boost::edge_centrality_t,
>>> > double,
>>> > > > > boost::no_property> >,
>>> boost::edge_centrality_t>,
>>> > > > > std::__1::less<double> >
>>> > > > > >' requested here
>>> > > > > edge_descriptor e =
>>> *max_element(edges_iters.first,
>>> > > > > edges_iters.seco...
>>> > > > >
>>> > rbgl_trimmed_boost_1_61_0/boost/graph/bc_clustering.hpp:146:3:
>>> note: in
>>> > > > > instantiation of function template
>>> specialization
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> 'boost::betweenness_centrality_clustering<boost::adjacency_list<boost::vecS,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > boost::vecS, boost::undirectedS,
>>> > > > > boost::property<boost::vertex_index_t,
>>> > > > > int,
>>> boost::property<boost::vertex_centrality_t,
>>> > double,
>>> > > > > boost::no_property> >,
>>> > boost::property<boost::edge_weight_t, double,
>>> > > > >
>>> boost::property<boost::edge_centrality_t, double,
>>> > > > > boost::no_property> >,
>>> > > > > boost::no_property, boost::listS>,
>>> > clustering_threshold,
>>> > > > >
>>> > boost::adj_list_edge_property_map<boost::undirected_tag, double,
>>> > > > > double &,
>>> > > > > unsigned long,
>>> > boost::property<boost::edge_weight_t, double,
>>> > > > >
>>> boost::property<boost::edge_centrality_t, double,
>>> > > > > boost::no_property> >,
>>> > > > > boost::edge_centrality_t>,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> boost::vec_adj_list_vertex_id_map<boost::property<boost::vertex_index_t,
>>> > > > > int,
>>> boost::property<boost::vertex_centrality_t,
>>> > double,
>>> > > > > boost::no_property> >, unsigned long> >'
>>> requested
>>> > here
>>> > > > > betweenness_centrality_clustering(g, done,
>>> > edge_centrality,
>>> > > > > ^
>>> > > > > bbc.cpp:122:3: note: in instantiation of
>>> function template
>>> > specialization
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> 'boost::betweenness_centrality_clustering<boost::adjacency_list<boost::vecS,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > boost::vecS, boost::undirectedS,
>>> > > > > boost::property<boost::vertex_index_t,
>>> > > > > int,
>>> boost::property<boost::vertex_centrality_t,
>>> > double,
>>> > > > > boost::no_property> >,
>>> > boost::property<boost::edge_weight_t, double,
>>> > > > >
>>> boost::property<boost::edge_centrality_t, double,
>>> > > > > boost::no_property> >,
>>> > > > > boost::no_property, boost::listS>,
>>> > clustering_threshold,
>>> > > > >
>>> > boost::adj_list_edge_property_map<boost::undirected_tag, double,
>>> > > > > double &,
>>> > > > > unsigned long,
>>> > boost::property<boost::edge_weight_t, double,
>>> > > > >
>>> boost::property<boost::edge_centrality_t, double,
>>> > > > > boost::no_property> >,
>>> > > > > boost::edge_centrality_t> >' requested
>>> here
>>> > > > >
>>> betweenness_centrality_clustering(g,
>>> > > > > ^
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > mzR 2.17.1
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > pwiz/data/identdata/Serializer_pepXML.cpp:25:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > pwiz/data/identdata/Serializer_pepXML.hpp:27:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> pwiz/data/identdata/IdentData.hpp:29:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> ./pwiz/utility/misc/Exception.hpp:29:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/string:505:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > > > >
>>> /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/string_view:176:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/__string:57:
>>> > > > >
>>> /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2428:5:
>>> > error:
>>> > > > > static_assert
>>> > > > > failed due to requirement
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> '__is_forward_iterator<boost::iterators::transform_iterator<pwiz::identdata::(anonymous
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > namespace)::EnzymePtr_specificity,
>>> > std::__1::__wrap_iter<const
>>> > > > >
>>> boost::shared_ptr<pwiz::identdata::Enzyme> *>,
>>> > > > > boost::iterators::use_default,
>>> > boost::iterators::use_default>
>>> > > > > >::value'
>>> > > > > "std::min_element requires a
>>> ForwardIterator"
>>> > > > >
>>> > static_assert(__is_forward_iterator<_ForwardIterator>::value,
>>> > > > > ^
>>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> > > > >
>>> /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2445:19:
>>> > note: in
>>> > > > > instantiation of function template
>>> specialization
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> 'std::__1::min_element<boost::iterators::transform_iterator<pwiz::identdata::(anonymous
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > namespace)::EnzymePtr_specificity,
>>> > std::__1::__wrap_iter<const
>>> > > > >
>>> boost::shared_ptr<pwiz::identdata::Enzyme> *>,
>>> > > > > boost::iterators::use_default,
>>> > boost::iterators::use_default>,
>>> > > > > std::__1::__less<int, int> >' requested
>>> here
>>> > > > > return _VSTD::min_element(__first, __last,
>>> > > > > ^
>>> > > > >
>>> ./boost/boost/range/algorithm/min_element.hpp:44:17: note:
>>> > in
>>> > > > > instantiation of
>>> > > > > function template specialization
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> 'std::__1::min_element<boost::iterators::transform_iterator<pwiz::identdata::(anonymous
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > namespace)::EnzymePtr_specificity,
>>> > std::__1::__wrap_iter<const
>>> > > > >
>>> boost::shared_ptr<pwiz::identdata::Enzyme> *>,
>>> > > > > boost::iterators::use_default,
>>> > boost::iterators::use_default> >'
>>> > > > > requested
>>> > > > > here
>>> > > > > return std::min_element(boost::begin(rng),
>>> > boost::end(rng));
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> pwiz/data/identdata/Serializer_pepXML.cpp:418:41: note: in
>>> > instantiation of
>>> > > > > function template specialization
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> 'boost::range::min_element<boost::range_detail::transformed_range<pwiz::identdata::(anonymous
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > namespace)::EnzymePtr_specificity, const
>>> > > > >
>>> > std::__1::vector<boost::shared_ptr<pwiz::identdata::Enzyme>,
>>> > > > >
>>> > std::__1::allocator<boost::shared_ptr<pwiz::identdata::Enzyme> >
>>> > > > > > > >'
>>> > > > > requested here
>>> > > > > int minSpecificity =
>>> > *boost::range::min_element(sip.enzymes.enzymes
>>> > > > > ...
>>> > > > > ^
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > pwiz/data/identdata/Serializer_pepXML.cpp:25:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > pwiz/data/identdata/Serializer_pepXML.hpp:27:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> pwiz/data/identdata/IdentData.hpp:29:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> ./pwiz/utility/misc/Exception.hpp:29:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/string:505:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > > > >
>>> /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/string_view:176:
>>> > > > > In file included from
>>> > /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/__string:57:
>>> > > > >
>>> /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2494:5:
>>> > error:
>>> > > > > static_assert
>>> > > > > failed due to requirement
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> '__is_forward_iterator<boost::iterators::transform_iterator<pwiz::identdata::(anonymous
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > namespace)::EnzymePtr_missedCleavages,
>>> > std::__1::__wrap_iter<const
>>> > > > >
>>> boost::shared_ptr<pwiz::identdata::Enzyme> *>,
>>> > > > > boost::iterators::use_default,
>>> > boost::iterators::use_default>
>>> > > > > >::value'
>>> > > > > "std::max_element requires a
>>> ForwardIterator"
>>> > > > >
>>> > static_assert(__is_forward_iterator<_ForwardIterator>::value,
>>> > > > > ^
>>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> > > > >
>>> /usr/local/clang8/bin/../include/c++/v1/algorithm:2512:19:
>>> > note: in
>>> > > > > instantiation of function template
>>> specialization
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> 'std::__1::max_element<boost::iterators::transform_iterator<pwiz::identdata::(anonymous
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > namespace)::EnzymePtr_missedCleavages,
>>> > std::__1::__wrap_iter<const
>>> > > > >
>>> boost::shared_ptr<pwiz::identdata::Enzyme> *>,
>>> > > > > boost::iterators::use_default,
>>> > boost::iterators::use_default>,
>>> > > > > std::__1::__less<int, int> >' requested
>>> here
>>> > > > > return _VSTD::max_element(__first, __last,
>>> > > > > ^
>>> > > > >
>>> ./boost/boost/range/algorithm/max_element.hpp:44:17: note:
>>> > in
>>> > > > > instantiation of
>>> > > > > function template specialization
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> >
>>> 'std::__1::max_element<boost::iterators::transform_iterator<pwiz::identdata::(anonymous
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > namespace)::EnzymePtr_missedCleavages,
>>> > std::__1::__wrap_iter<const
>>> > > > >
>>> boost::shared_ptr<pwiz::identdata::Enzyme> *>,
>>> > > > > boost::iterators::use_default,
>>> > boost::iterators::use_default> >'
>>> > > > > requested
>>> > > > > here
>>> > > > > return std::max_element(boost::begin(rng),
>>> > boost::end(rng));
>>> > > > > ...
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > Brian D. Ripley,
>>> ripley using stats.ox.ac.uk
>>> > > > Emeritus Professor of Applied Statistics,
>>> University of
>>> > Oxford
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > This email message may contain legally privileged
>>> and/or
>>> > confidential information. If you are not the intended
>>> recipient(s), or the
>>> > employee or agent responsible for the delivery of this message
>>> to the
>>> > intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any
>>> disclosure,
>>> > copying, distribution, or use of this email message is
>>> prohibited. If you
>>> > have received this message in error, please notify the sender
>>> immediately
>>> > by e-mail and delete this email message from your computer.
>>> Thank you.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > This email message may contain legally privileged and/or
>>> confidential
>>> > information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the
>>> employee or
>>> > agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the
>>> intended
>>> > recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
>>> copying,
>>> > distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If
>>> you have
>>> > received this message in error, please notify the sender
>>> immediately by
>>> > e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank
>>> you.
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
>>> ...{{dropped:18}}
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bioc-devel using r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bioc-devel using r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>>>
>>
>
More information about the Bioc-devel
mailing list