[Bioc-devel] download stats
Antonio Colaprico
acolapri at ulb.ac.be
Tue Nov 29 22:51:42 CET 2016
Dear all,
Dear Hervè,
I noted something strange with the download stats in November if you
consider even default Bioconductor packages (*BiocInstaller* (26209)
<http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/bioc/BiocInstaller/>, *BiocGenerics*
(18864) <http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/bioc/BiocGenerics/>,
*IRanges* (18129) <http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/bioc/IRanges/> etc
they are showing about 50% of the download stats compared to other months
of the year.
I know my post is similar to one posted by Kasper indeed I had the same
sensation maybe because there is Christmas atmosphere around.
Therefore if I'm not mistaken or I lost some news about the stats how
Kasper did know already about this issue 3 weeks ago? ;-)
@Hervè please when you have time can you check them?
Thank you in advance.
Best,
Antonio
2016-11-08 19:04 GMT+01:00 Kasper Daniel Hansen <
kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com>:
> This is a bit embarrassing. Somehow I was convinced it was December. All
> looks fine.("... you have gained a level in Distracted Professorship").
>
> Kasper
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Hervé Pagès <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Kasper,
> >
> > The download stats just got updated:
> >
> > http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/
> >
> > They are updated twice a week, on Tuesday and Friday between 8
> > and 9 AM PST. Note that because of how the download log files are
> > generated and propagated to the machine where the stats are computed,
> > and because of the time it takes to generate the stats reports for
> > all the packages, the current stats don't take into account the
> > downloads that happened during the last 24 hours (more or less).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > H.
> >
> >
> > On 11/08/2016 07:50 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
> >
> >> It was pointed out to me that the (sub) heading on the page tells me
> that
> >> the script for counting downloads was last run Nov 4th, explaining the
> >> discrepancy.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen <
> >> kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there something wrong with the download stats in November. All the
> >>> packages I look at have lost about 85-90% compared to other months of
> the
> >>> year:
> >>> http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/bioc/GenomicRanges/
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Kasper
> >>>
> >>>
> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > Hervé Pagès
> >
> > Program in Computational Biology
> > Division of Public Health Sciences
> > Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
> > 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514
> > P.O. Box 19024
> > Seattle, WA 98109-1024
> >
> > E-mail: hpages at fredhutch.org
> > Phone: (206) 667-5791
> > Fax: (206) 667-1319
> >
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the Bioc-devel
mailing list