[Bioc-devel] no build reports (nor builds) for Windows in BioC 3.4

[Ramon Diaz-Uriarte]

Dear Andrzej,

On Mon, 04-07-2016, at 15:13, Andrzej Oleś <andrzej.oles at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry, I didn't notice the Windows part in the message subject.

I should have been explicit in the message body. My fault.

>
> Indeed, the windows builder in devel seems to be offline. For example, the
> the latest version of BiocStyle available from the website is 2.1.4, while
> the subsequent version 2.1.5 was committed almost a month ago on Jun 9.
>

Thanks for confirming. And thanks for that example (the ones I checked were
only a week to 10 days old).

> I'm not sure what happened to the windows machine, maybe someone from the
> core team has more insight into this.
>


Best,

R.

P.S. Sorry for misspelling your name in the previous email  :-)

> Cheers,
> Andrzej
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte <rdiaz02 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrezj,
>>
>> Sorry, the text of the message was not explicit (but the subject message
>> was): no builds for **Windows**.
>>
>> So, yes, the page says "This page was generated on 2016-07-03 15:29:33
>> -0700 (Sun, 03 Jul 2016)."
>>
>> but there are not reports for Windows, only for machines zin1 (Linux) and
>> Morelia (Mac). You can also see this if, from the page of any package in
>> devel, you click on the build status badge: you only get them from zin1 and
>> morelia, not for any windows machine.
>>
>> And for at least some packages, the Windows version is lagging behind the
>> Linux and Macs versions (consistent with the idea of no builds for at least
>> a weak).
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>>
>> R.
>>
>> On Mon, 04-07-2016, at 13:02, Andrzej Oleś <andrzej.oles at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Ramon,
>> >
>> > why do you think there have been no build in the past week? The header on
>> > the page you provided says:
>> >
>> > *This page was generated on 2016-07-03 15:29:33 -0700 (Sun, 03 Jul
>> 2016).*
>> > From what I see the builds are up to date and reflect recent changes to
>> the
>> > svn.
>> >
>> > Maybe some browser caching issue on your side?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Andrzej
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte <rdiaz02 at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Dear All,
>> >>
>> >> During at least the last eight days I think there have been no new
>> builds,
>> >> nor build reports, for BioC 3.4 (devel):
>> >>
>> >> http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/
>> >>
>> >> Is this on purpose?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> R.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
>> >> Department of Biochemistry, Lab B-25
>> >> Facultad de Medicina
>> >> Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
>> >> Arzobispo Morcillo, 4
>> >> 28029 Madrid
>> >> Spain
>> >>
>> >> Phone: +34-91-497-2412
>> >>
>> >> Email: rdiaz02 at gmail.com
>> >>        ramon.diaz at iib.uam.es
>> >>
>> >> http://ligarto.org/rdiaz
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
>> Department of Biochemistry, Lab B-25
>> Facultad de Medicina
>> Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
>> Arzobispo Morcillo, 4
>> 28029 Madrid
>> Spain
>>
>> Phone: +34-91-497-2412
>>
>> Email: rdiaz02 at gmail.com
>>        ramon.diaz at iib.uam.es
>>
>> http://ligarto.org/rdiaz
>>


-- 
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Department of Biochemistry, Lab B-25
Facultad de Medicina
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 
Arzobispo Morcillo, 4
28029 Madrid
Spain

Phone: +34-91-497-2412

Email: rdiaz02 at gmail.com
       ramon.diaz at iib.uam.es

http://ligarto.org/rdiaz