[Bioc-devel] no build reports (nor builds) for Windows in BioC 3.4

Martin Morgan martin.morgan at roswellpark.org
Mon Jul 4 15:20:07 CEST 2016


On 07/04/2016 09:13 AM, Andrzej Oleś wrote:
> I'm sorry, I didn't notice the Windows part in the message subject.
>
> Indeed, the windows builder in devel seems to be offline. For example, the
> the latest version of BiocStyle available from the website is 2.1.4, while
> the subsequent version 2.1.5 was committed almost a month ago on Jun 9.
>
> I'm not sure what happened to the windows machine, maybe someone from the
> core team has more insight into this.

There is a problem where one or more packages spawn processes that are 
not killed by the build system code. These then break subsequent steps. 
This has proved difficult to trouble-shoot, but is being worked on.

Sorry for the problems.

Martin


>
> Cheers,
> Andrzej
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte <rdiaz02 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrezj,
>>
>> Sorry, the text of the message was not explicit (but the subject message
>> was): no builds for **Windows**.
>>
>> So, yes, the page says "This page was generated on 2016-07-03 15:29:33
>> -0700 (Sun, 03 Jul 2016)."
>>
>> but there are not reports for Windows, only for machines zin1 (Linux) and
>> Morelia (Mac). You can also see this if, from the page of any package in
>> devel, you click on the build status badge: you only get them from zin1 and
>> morelia, not for any windows machine.
>>
>> And for at least some packages, the Windows version is lagging behind the
>> Linux and Macs versions (consistent with the idea of no builds for at least
>> a weak).
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>>
>> R.
>>
>> On Mon, 04-07-2016, at 13:02, Andrzej Oleś <andrzej.oles at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Ramon,
>>>
>>> why do you think there have been no build in the past week? The header on
>>> the page you provided says:
>>>
>>> *This page was generated on 2016-07-03 15:29:33 -0700 (Sun, 03 Jul
>> 2016).*
>>>  From what I see the builds are up to date and reflect recent changes to
>> the
>>> svn.
>>>
>>> Maybe some browser caching issue on your side?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Andrzej
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte <rdiaz02 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> During at least the last eight days I think there have been no new
>> builds,
>>>> nor build reports, for BioC 3.4 (devel):
>>>>
>>>> http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/
>>>>
>>>> Is this on purpose?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> R.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
>>>> Department of Biochemistry, Lab B-25
>>>> Facultad de Medicina
>>>> Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
>>>> Arzobispo Morcillo, 4
>>>> 28029 Madrid
>>>> Spain
>>>>
>>>> Phone: +34-91-497-2412
>>>>
>>>> Email: rdiaz02 at gmail.com
>>>>         ramon.diaz at iib.uam.es
>>>>
>>>> http://ligarto.org/rdiaz
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
>> Department of Biochemistry, Lab B-25
>> Facultad de Medicina
>> Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
>> Arzobispo Morcillo, 4
>> 28029 Madrid
>> Spain
>>
>> Phone: +34-91-497-2412
>>
>> Email: rdiaz02 at gmail.com
>>         ramon.diaz at iib.uam.es
>>
>> http://ligarto.org/rdiaz
>>
>
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>


This email message may contain legally privileged and/or...{{dropped:2}}



More information about the Bioc-devel mailing list