[Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields

Dan Tenenbaum dtenenba at fredhutch.org
Wed May 13 21:36:59 CEST 2015



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henrik Bengtsson" <henrik.bengtsson at ucsf.edu>
> To: "COMMO Frederic" <Frederic.COMMO at gustaveroussy.fr>
> Cc: bioc-devel at r-project.org
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 12:28:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
> 
> Sweet; you went live with the badges/shields, e.g.
> 
>   http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/affxparser.html
> 
> A positive side effect is that now there's a link from the package
> page to to the package's check results, which I always wanted :)
> 

That was there before (and still is, see the bottom of the Details section). But yes, it was not very visible.

Dan


> Thanks for adding this
> 
> /Henrik
> 
> 
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 11:39 AM, COMMO Frederic
> <Frederic.COMMO at gustaveroussy.fr> wrote:
> > Dear Martin,
> >
> > All of these suggestions sound good.
> >
> > Wolfgang's suggestion regarding possible associated papers might be
> > also great.
> >
> > Another useful information would be to point to other publications
> > where a given package was used, and cited.
> > I don't know if it's technically possible, but it would be greatly
> > informative to know how frequently a package is used, and how it
> > performs, in real contexts.
> >
> > Frederic Commo
> > Bioinformatics, U981
> > Gustave Roussy
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > De : Bioc-devel [bioc-devel-bounces at r-project.org] de la part de
> > Wolfgang Huber [whuber at embl.de]
> > Date d'envoi : samedi 9 mai 2015 19:57
> > À : Martin Morgan
> > Cc: bioc-devel at r-project.org
> > Objet : Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
> >
> > Dear Martin
> >
> > great idea.
> > "Current build status” could perhaps be wrapped with
> > "Cross-platform availability” into some sort of “Availability /
> > Accessibility”?
> >
> > I wonder how informative it would be to make metrics such as
> > (i) citations of the associated paper
> > (ii) full-text mentions e.g. in PubmedCentral
> > actually useful. (i) could be flawed if package and paper are
> > diverged; (ii) would require good disambiguation, e.g. like
> > bioNerDS http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/14/194 (or other
> > tools? not my expertise). Do we have someone with capabilities in
> > this area on this list?
> >
> > PS  Martin you’ll like Fig. 2 of their paper.
> >
> > Wolfgang
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On May 9, 2015, at 19:15 GMT+2, Martin Morgan
> >> <mtmorgan at fredhutch.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Bioc developers!
> >>
> >> It's important that our users be able to identify packages that
> >> are suitable for their research question. Obviously a first step
> >> is to identify packages in the appropriate research domain, for
> >> instance through biocViews.
> >>
> >>  http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/
> >>
> >> We'd like to help users further prioritize their efforts by
> >> summarizing use and usability. Metrics include:
> >>
> >> - Cross-platform availability -- biocLite()-able from all or only
> >> some platforms
> >> - Support forum activity -- questions and comments / responses, 6
> >> month window
> >> - Download percentile -- top 5, 20, 50%, or 'available'
> >> - Current build status -- errors or warnings on some or all
> >> platforms
> >> - Developer activity -- commits in the last 6 months
> >> - Historical presence -- years in Bioconductor
> >>
> >> Obviously the metrics are imperfect, so constructive feedback
> >> welcome -- we think the above capture in a more-or-less objective
> >> and computable way the major axes influencing use and usability.
> >>
> >> We initially intend to prominently display 'shields' (small
> >> graphical icons) on package landing pages.
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance for your comments,
> >>
> >> Martin Morgan
> >> Bioconductor
> >> --
> >> Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
> >> 1100 Fairview Ave. N.
> >> PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109
> >>
> >> Location: Arnold Building M1 B861
> >> Phone: (206) 667-2793
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> 



More information about the Bioc-devel mailing list