[Bioc-devel] evaluation of C post-increments changed in GCC	4.8.2
    Robert Castelo 
    robert.castelo at upf.edu
       
    Thu Jun 12 17:45:39 CEST 2014
    
    
  
hi Dan,
On 06/12/2014 04:28 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
[...]
>
> Thanks for figuring this out and sharing it.
>
> Note that on the build machines, the compiler used on Mavericks is not gcc but clang.
> More info here:
>
> http://www.bioconductor.org/checkResults/2.14/bioc-LATEST/morelia-NodeInfo.html
> http://www.bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.0/bioc-LATEST/oaxaca-NodeInfo.html
ok, i see, one question, in the build reports at the BioC site the R CMD 
check warns about this kind of problematic post-increment suggesting 
this is the result of using the option -Wunsequenced
i've been trying to install and check my package using that option but i 
cannot find the way to do it.
could you tell me how have you set up the R CMD INSTALL or R CMD CHECK 
command in the building pipeline so that the compiler warns about this 
problem?
is actually -Wunsequenced a specific option of this 'clang' compiler?
thanks!
robert.
    
    
More information about the Bioc-devel
mailing list