[Bioc-devel] R version in Bioc packages (was Re: [BioC] Package \'jmosaics\' not found)
James W. MacDonald
jmacdon at uw.edu
Tue May 21 17:47:35 CEST 2013
Not that I can recall. But I do agree that it is at minimum redundant
and probably just wrong to have R-version requirements for BioC packages.
And seriously? 500 packages? I find that surprising.
On 5/21/2013 11:38 AM, Martin Morgan wrote:
> Pulling this over to Bioc-devel. It's tempting to strip this from the
> DESCRIPTION files of the ~500 packages that include it. It's not
> useful in the context of the Bioconductor release schedule, and makes
> a forward promise that cannot be guaranteed.
> Is this something that has come up before?
> On 05/21/2013 08:28 AM, James W. MacDonald wrote:
>> It does say R >= 2.15.2 in the Depends, which is misleading.
James W. MacDonald, M.S.
University of Washington
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences
4225 Roosevelt Way NE, # 100
Seattle WA 98105-6099
More information about the Bioc-devel