[Bioc-devel] [GenomicFeatures] no pkgName found. makeTxDbPackage() called after txdb created from GFF3 file
Marc Carlson
mcarlson at fhcrc.org
Sat Feb 9 10:56:40 CET 2013
Hi Malcolm,
In general I have found ensembl to be really great and I expect that
their gtf files are probably fine. Usually the exon rank is the 1st
thing you will see left out when a gtf file is cutting corners, and you
are correct that they seem to be including that. I ran the one for Homo
sapiens though makeTranscriptDbFromGFF() and everything appears to be in
working order.
I wanted to warn Tengfei about this because I worry that most people
will be surprised to learn that the gtf file format comes with fewer
guarantees about the data included than they might have expected. I
also mentioned it because I noticed that his function call to
makeTranscriptDbFromGFF() did not specify an exonRankAttributeName,
which strongly implies to me that maybe that his file might not have had
that information present. The assumption was that if he had that
information, he would have supplied that argument so that he could make
use of it. But another possibility is that Tengfei just didn't need
that information at all, in which case this will all just be another
(possibly unwarranted) public service message. If that is the case, I
apologise for the noise.
Marc
On 02/08/2013 06:19 PM, Cook, Malcolm wrote:
> .Hi Tengfei,
> .
> .Yes that looks like an oversight. Thanks for reporting that! I will
> .extend makeTxDbPackage so that it's more accommodating of these newer
> .transcriptDbs. If you want to help me out, you could call saveDb() on
> .your gmax189 object and send me the .sqlite file that you save it to.
> .
> .Also, if you have any alternate options for importing your data (other
> .than using GFF or GTF): I think you probably should consider it. The
> .file specifications for these filetypes are missing key details and so
> .you can very easily get a "legal" GFF or GTF file that is actually
> .missing important details from it's contents. For example, they can
> .commonly lack information about the order of the exons for a given
> .transcript, which can render them difficult (or impossible) to use for
> .transcript work. But for these specifications, that information is
> ."optional".
>
> Marco, do you have any comment on ensembl GTF (which has exon order) in this regard?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Malcolm
>
> .
> .
> . Marc
> .
> .
> .
> .On 02/06/2013 09:46 PM, Tengfei Yin wrote:
> .> Dear all,
> .>
> .> I am trying to build a txdb object from gff3 for soybean data and try to
> .> make it a package. Code used like this
> .>
> .> gmax189<- makeTranscriptDbFromGFF("~/Gmax_189_gene_exons.gff3",
> .> format = "gff3", species = "Glycine max",
> .> dataSource = "http://www.phytozome.org/")
> .> makeTxDbPackage(txdb = gmax189,
> .> version = "0.9.1",
> .> maintainer = "Tengfei Yin",
> .> author = "Tengfei Yin",
> .> destDir=".",
> .> license="Artistic-2.0")
> .>
> .> Error message:
> .> Error in gsub("_", "", pkgName) :
> .> error in evaluating the argument 'x' in selecting a method for function
> .> 'gsub': Error: object 'pkgName' not found
> .>
> .>
> .> Looks like my dataSource should be either BioMart or UCSC, otherwise no
> .> pkgname will be produced in function .makePackageName?
> .>
> .> Or should I build annotation package in some other ways?
> .>
> .> Thanks a lot
> .>
> .> Tengfei
> .>
> .> my sessionInfo
> .>
> .>> sessionInfo()
> .> R Under development (unstable) (2013-01-21 r61728)
> .> Platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit)
> .>
> .> locale:
> .> [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C
> .> [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8
> .> [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
> .> [7] LC_PAPER=C LC_NAME=C
> .> [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
> .> [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
> .>
> .> attached base packages:
> .> [1] parallel stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods
> .> [8] base
> .>
> .> other attached packages:
> .> [1] GenomicFeatures_1.11.8 AnnotationDbi_1.21.10 Biobase_2.19.2
> .> [4] GenomicRanges_1.11.28 IRanges_1.17.31 BiocGenerics_0.5.6
> .>
> .> loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
> .> [1] biomaRt_2.15.0 Biostrings_2.27.10 bitops_1.0-5
> .> BSgenome_1.27.1
> .> [5] DBI_0.2-5 RCurl_1.95-3 Rsamtools_1.11.15
> .> RSQLite_0.11.2
> .> [9] rtracklayer_1.19.9 stats4_3.0.0 tools_3.0.0 XML_3.95-0.1
> .>
> .> [13] zlibbioc_1.5.0
> .>
> .>
> .
> ._______________________________________________
> .Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> .https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
More information about the Bioc-devel
mailing list