[Bioc-devel] Bug in DEXSeq, me thinks
Alejandro Reyes
alejandro.reyes at embl.de
Wed Mar 14 18:17:19 CET 2012
Dear Steve,
Thanks for the bug reports! I think what was missing in in the muhats
lapply was the "simplify =FALSE", what I find strange its that you are
the first one to get an error from it, might be because there is at
least one "try-error" in almost the datasets and this avoids it to be
converted in a matrix. Anyway I changed everything to lapply just to be
on the safe side.
Regarding the:
length(testablegenes) %% mc.cores == 0
I did not manage to reproduce this error, but I agree that this function
(divideWork) was a bit messy. With Wolfgang's help we re-engineered
this function and took away the sapply-s, I am hoping that this won't
give errors anymore. Let me know!
Thanks again!
Alejandro
> And another sapply -> lapply in divideWork (core_functions ~ line 496):
>
> fData(ecs)[,fattr][rows]<- do.call(c, sapply(...))
>
> is exploding when
>
> length(testablegenes) %% mc.cores == 0
>
> -steve
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Steve Lianoglou
> <mailinglist.honeypot at gmail.com> wrote:
>> And while we're at it, I think there's another place you need to swap
>> out an lapply for an sapply (or set simplify=FALSE) in the
>> `divideWork` function.
>>
>> Specifically, it seems that when `testablegenes` is divisible by mc.cores:
>>
>> (1) This sapply call returns a matrix back to `rowlist`, when you
>> really want a list, since you will `do.call(c, rowlist)` later:
>>
>> rowlist<- sapply(1:mc.cores, function(i){which(fData(ecs)$geneID %in%
>> subgenes[[i]])})
>>
>> (2) Ditto for your `stopifnot` check. The `do.call(c, sapply(...))`
>> explodes because the sapply returns a matrix:
>>
>> stopifnot(all(as.character(fData(ecs)$geneID)[rows] == do.call(c,
>> sapply(allecs, function(x){as.character(fData(x)$geneID)}))))
>>
>> ... or ... at least these things are happening for me right now.
>>
>> I have a weird feeling that I might have hosed something, since I
>> reckon people would have tripped over this by now since it's easy to
>> fall into this scenario where:
>>
>> length(testablegenes) %% mc.cores == 0
>>
>> when mc.cores == 2
>>
>> So ... hopefully I'm not just chasing my tail then asking you to chase yours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -steve
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Steve Lianoglou
>> <mailinglist.honeypot at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> And then add names back to muhats, of course:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Steve Lianoglou
>>> <mailinglist.honeypot at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> It just so happened that DEXSeq, for reasons I couldn't explain, kept
>>>> throwing errors during a call to `estimateDispersions`. I couldn't
>>>> explain it because I really thought I didn't change much, but I've got
>>>> some magic combination of samples I'm currently trying to
>>>> estimateDispersion on that none of them throw any errors while
>>>> estimate `muhats` (line 245 of core_functions.R):
>>>>
>>>> muhats<- sapply(testablegenes, function(gn) {
>>>> ...
>>>> muhat
>>>> })
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> names(muhats)<- testablegenes
>>>
>>> -steve
>>> --
>>> Steve Lianoglou
>>> Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology
>>> | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
>>> | Weill Medical College of Cornell University
>>> Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steve Lianoglou
>> Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology
>> | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
>> | Weill Medical College of Cornell University
>> Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact
>
>
More information about the Bioc-devel
mailing list