[Rd] `as.data.frame.matrix()` can produce a data frame without a `names` attribute

Martin Maechler m@ech|er @end|ng |rom @t@t@m@th@ethz@ch
Fri Mar 22 11:17:34 CET 2024


>>>>> Davis Vaughan via R-devel 
>>>>>     on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:10:29 -0400 writes:

    > Hi all,

    > I recently learned that it is possible for
    > `as.data.frame.matrix()` to produce a data frame with 0
    > columns that is also entirely missing a `names` attribute,
    > and I think this is a bug:

    > ``` # No `names`, weird!
    > attributes(as.data.frame(matrix(nrow = 0, ncol = 0))) #>
    > $class #> [1] "data.frame"
    > #>
    > #> $row.names #> integer(0)

    > # This is what I expected attributes(data.frame()) #>
    > $names #> character(0)
    > #>
    > #> $row.names #> integer(0)
    > #>
    > #> $class #> [1] "data.frame" ```

    > In my experience, 0 column data frames should probably
    > still have a `names` attribute, and it should be set to
    > `character()`. 

I agree.

A (very nice IMO) patch  I'm currently testing is

317c317
< 	names(value) <- collabs
---
> 	names(value) <- collabs %||% character()

Martin

    > Some evidence to support my theory is that
    > OOB subsetting doesn't give the intended error with this
    > weird data frame:

    > ``` # Good OOB error df <- data.frame() df[1] #> Error in
    > `[.data.frame`(df, 1): undefined columns selected

    > # This is weird!  df <- as.data.frame(matrix(nrow = 0,
    > ncol = 0)) df[1] #> NULL #> <0 rows> (or 0-length
    > row.names) ```

    > The one exception to requiring a `names` attribute that I
    > can think of is `as.data.frame(optional = TRUE)`, mostly
    > for internal use by `data.frame()` on each of the columns,
    > but that doesn't seem to apply here.

    > Thanks, Davis Vaughan

    > ______________________________________________
    > R-devel using r-project.org mailing list
    > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



More information about the R-devel mailing list