[Rd] embed Sweave driver in .Rnw file

Duncan Murdoch murdoch.duncan at gmail.com
Tue Dec 14 16:26:23 CET 2010


On 14/12/2010 9:54 AM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
> Another question about Sweave (actually it is more a question
> about TeX). Is there a reliable (system-independent) way to
> use Sweave.sty without having to place it in the current working
> directory? MiKTeX under Windows has dropped the use of
> TEXINPUTS, and this complicates the problem.

If you run it from R, the right path will be put in place.  The 
tools::texi2dvi function does this.

> Furthermore, you cannot refer to Sweave.sty using its full path
> as this would obviously not be system-independent.
>
> Yet another small issue: If I configure Sweave to use a
> temp directory for its temp files, and if this temp directory
> does not exist, TeX fails with error diagnostics that is not
> clear at all. Is there a way to have TeX automatically
> create the directory if necessary?

I don't understand this one.  Are you talking about a "prefix=somedir/" 
option to Sweave?  That needs to be there before TeX is run.  I 
sometimes put a  dir.create("somedir", showWarnings=FALSE) call in an 
early chunk in the document to create it.

Duncan Murdoch

> Thanks,
> Dominick
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Friedrich Leisch<
> friedrich.leisch at stat.uni-muenchen.de>  wrote:
>
> >  >>>>>  On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:40:04 +0100,
> >  >>>>>  Romain Francois (RF) wrote:
> >
> >   >  Hello,
> >   >  Sweave lets you use alternative drivers through the driver argument, and
> >   >  several packages take advantage of that and define custom Sweave driver
> >   >  for various purposes. Most of them are listed on the Reproducible
> >   >  Research CTV:
> >   >  (http://cran.r-project.org/web/views/ReproducibleResearch.html)
> >
> >   >  The next natural step is for package developpers to take advantage of
> >   >  this in their vignettes. In Rcpp we work around the way package building
> >   >  works and we do:
> >   >  - let R build a dummy vignette
> >   >  - then use the inst/doc/Makefile to replace it with a vignette that is
> >   >  processed by the driver from the highlight package (giving syntax
> >   >  highlighting).
> >
> >   >  I played with Sweave so that it would be able to create the driver from
> >   >  some text included in the text of the .Rnw file:
> >
> >   >  $ svn diff
> >   >  Index: src/library/utils/R/Sweave.R
> >   >  ===================================================================
> >   >  --- src/library/utils/R/Sweave.R    (revision 53846)
> >   >  +++ src/library/utils/R/Sweave.R    (working copy)
> >   >  @@ -20,6 +20,16 @@
> >   >    # We don't need srclines for code, but we do need it for text, and
> >   >  it's easiest
> >   >    # to just keep it for everything.
> >
> >   >  +SweaveGetDriver<- function(file){
> >   >  +    txt<- readLines(file)
> >   >  +    line<- grep( "\\SweaveDriver", txt, value = TRUE )
> >   >  +    if( length(line) ){
> >   >  +        txt<- sub( "^.*\\SweaveDriver[{](.*)[}]", "\\1", line[1L] )
> >   >  +        driver<- try( eval( parse( text = txt ) ), silent = TRUE )
> >   >  +        if( !inherits( driver, "try-error") ) driver
> >   >  +    }
> >   >  +}
> >   >  +
> >   >    Sweave<- function(file, driver=RweaveLatex(),
> >   >                       syntax=getOption("SweaveSyntax"), ...)
> >   >    {
> >   >  @@ -28,7 +38,9 @@
> >   >        else if(is.function(driver))
> >   >            driver<- driver()
> >
> >   >  -
> >   >  +    drv<- SweaveGetDriver(file)
> >   >  +    if( !is.null(drv) ) driver<- drv
> >   >  +
> >   >        if(is.null(syntax))
> >   >            syntax<- SweaveGetSyntax(file)
> >   >        if(is.character(syntax))
> >
> >
> >
> >   >  This allows one to write something like this in their file:
> >
> >   >  %\SweaveDriver{ { require(highlight); HighlightWeaveLatex() } }
> >
> >   >  So that when calling :
> >
> >   >>  Sweave( "somefile.Rnw" )
> >
> >   >  the highlight driver is used instead of the default driver.
> >
> >   >  Could something like that be added to Sweave ?
> >
> >  Yes, sure!
> >
> >  Will have a look at the patch later this week and apply it if it
> >  passes the tests. The patch is against a current r-devel?
> >
> >  Best,
> >  Fritz
> >
> >  ______________________________________________
> >  R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> >  https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> >
>
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



More information about the R-devel mailing list